PERP SAVVY
The three photographs directly beneath this paragraph were taken September 21st, 2018. The images are all the same bottle. It is the bottle commonly used to dispense prescriptions. The standard practice when someone has a prescription filled is to hand the form to a pharmacy technician, who then verifies that the name and relevant information on the form are accurate. When the prescription is ready, then it is picked up at the opposite end of where it was dropped off. Before the pharmacist or technician hands the prescription over, the name is again verified along with the payment information. This is the standard operating procedure for every pharmacy. This prescription should not have been filled. At a minimum, the prescribing physician should have been contacted. The Sherwood Police Department in Sherwood, Oregon, should have been called. Why? If you examine the photographs, you will see that the patient's name makes no sense. Visit the History Page for more information.
The pharmacist is processing the prescription because he wants to please Ms. Magnusson. Or the prescription in being sent via the network so it can be picked up. The latter is Ms. Magnusson's area of expertise. The probability is she gained access to the LAN side of the network while hooking up with Dr. Baldwin at his office late at night.
The photos below are three of the many emails and photocopies exchanged between PPO and Chime. What they represent is an attempt to deposit a forged financial instrument, on or about October, 10th 2022. The account number on the check is from Wells Fargo. PPO received the email from Chime. This notification states that Chime does not accept actual paper checks for deposit. Why would the person who has the Chime account send them a paper check in the mail? On top of this, send it to the wrong place? The account holder would take a photo of the check, write for Chime deposit, take a photo and upload it, or go to an ATM.
Once PPO had a copy of the check, he phoned the Hillsboro Police department to report that someone had tried to deposit a forged check into his account. As expected, PPO was told that there was nothing to report. That this is a civil matter for Wells Fargo. ORS 165.013 clearly states that forgery, fraud, and deception can be committed using a variety of ways, means, and methods. There are equal methods available as punishment, involving incarceration, fines, and restitution. PPO stated that he went to Wells Fargo to inform them of what had occurred. The Wells Fargo employee stated that it would have to be reported by the account holder. When PPO requested the information of the account holder, he was denied.
Between September 2020 and August 2021, PPO was in the Washington county jail. Since this cannot be refuted, why was his PayPal account being accessed and actively used? Anyone can see that the account was active until a short while after getting released from jail. The PayPal account was PPO's only option for regaining a foothold financially. Xenia Fretter was aware of this. Once PPO was ready to start using his PayPal account. A block was put on his PayPal account. He was denied access repeatedly. According to PPO, he had never used his PayPal account to conduct any actual transactions. Other to deposit a small amount of money into the account when it was established. Despite his every effort, PayPal placed a lifetime ban on his account. Then followed it up with the message marked by the red triangle. Telling PPO that he has crossed some boundary that makes him undesirable. Labeling him a danger to the PayPal community.
This time it is an attempt at setting up a direct deposit with Chime. The intent is to prevent PPO from being able to use the services of Chime. The fact that the account on the image is not his employer would open up the possibility for criminal prosecution. According to PPO, he discovered the email in his sent folder. With the direct deposit check attached. Again, this points to TFM using her hacking skills to access PPO's computer or phone.
Now here is the problem that has become more than worrisome. According to PPO, he attempted to present the information to the Hillsboro Police Department. He was refused. To be clear, the Hillsboro Police Department did not refuse to open a case after seeing the evidence. The Hillsboro Police Department refused to even provide an incident number PPO over the phone. HPD had refused to even look at the evidence PPO has offered to provide. Apparently, the policy or law with the Hillsboro Police Department is this: If an officer decides that no crime has been committed, then they can just walk away. Based solely on the opinion of the officer. Doesn't have to look at any evidence that is offered. Whatever the reason is, PPO is refused the basic services provided to the rest of the citizens of Hillsboro. I have yet to discover anything about PPO's past that would give this police department cause to disregard him. I have yet to put an HPD officer on the spot with the question of why. Quite frankly, I am concerned that I may suffer the treatment.
