There is nothing comparable to actual real world experience; seeing is believing. This is what it will take for 99% of men to accept that a woman can be dangerous. Even then, men may not see the waring signs. If she is subtle enough the warning signs, red flags, will go unnoticed. Without fail, men will let their guard down, even when there has been sufficient warnings. The chemistry within the male brain is not designed to set off the alarms unless it's another man wielding a weapon or outright challenging us. We just don't get it. By the time we do, it may be too late.
There are women who have made the headlines, gotten life sentences, even death sentences. Even though this is common knowledge, the male brain will not consider women dangerous. This is mainly because women that are predators do not hunt the way men do. The woman that is a predator is methodical, careful selection is her goal. Find the prey that can be separated from the rest of the herd. Is he single or divorced? Are his children involved ih his life? What does he do for a living? How many friends does he have? All of this information is important to this predator.
The majority of men can see a "gold digger" coming from a mile away. This type is usually accessorized with red flags. The simple truth is the majority of men are not on the gold digger's radar. What men do not suspect is a well-educated woman that they met on a pleasant dating site. Not a hook-up site. She is well-mannered, doesn't smoke, dresses modestly, isn't wearing a lot of make-up, and is patient while he is doing something that doesn't involve her at all. This predator comes with no warning signs. He will not know that her questions are not really her way checking to see if he is involved with another woman or if he is a good provider for his children. Her questions, in reality, are designed to see how much work she is going to have to put in to isolate him well enough to victimize him. How close are his nearest relatives? Does he have children, are they grown and gone? What's his relationship with his ex-wife like? Who are his friends? She wants to know all of this for a reason. Like any good hunter, she is looking for the prey that is easiest to isolate, separate from the herd.
To be continued...
This is her, according to him - She has a Masters in Adult Education, is a highly skilled ASL interpreter, and is well-read, more than above average intelligence. She gardens, bakes, plays a variety of musical instruments, and can muddle around in several languages; so much as she can pick up on what is being said sometimes. She doesn't smoke, has a tendency to be participating in quirky hobbies; usually for a reason. Everything is done for a reason. She is frugal, on the surface. But will spend obscene amounts of time, energy, and money on some pursuits. Her personal appearance is not typical. She wears no makeup, doesn't wear expensive clothes, nor is her clothing form fitting. Despite her outward affect, she exudes a sexuality, without even trying. Some men get it, others don't. The one thing nobody knows, is this is all a deception. It is to trick the mind. She is always doing one thing above all others. She is hunting for a victim. She is a predator. She is looking for her first kill or her next; still not sure about this.
Her narcissism presents itself as vulnerable. She has all the grandiosity, however, it is manifested through her daughter. She is egosyntonic, sadistic, somatic of the body. Lacks any obvious empathy, compassion, sympathy, or any other real emotional capability; except for a seething anger or hatred, when provoked. She can fake the emotions, well at times. When she cries her tears are manufactured by literally putting her fingers in her eyes. She conceals this with her long, black hair. She doesn't appear to be anything other than what you see. She was asked, "If there is one thing you could do to improve yourself, what would this be?" She thought about this for much longer than one would expect. She had no response.
Because she is a vulnerable narcissist, this makes her vindictive. This is to a level that no amount of time will cause her to let go of even the mildest perceived slight. The majority of the time, the injury she has suffered is conjured within her own mind. This is to delude herself into believing that she is infallible. She must protect the inner her. The little girl that is frightened by the outside world. Her brain and mind have constructed this elaborate and extremely dangerous facade. She is a Malignant Narcissistic Psychopath. This is the one thing that PPO is adamant about. He will not listen to anyone telling him she is not.
He has spent a lot of time around her; eight years. There is something to be said about that. I have never met her, and I do not want to. These words are his. This is his assessment of her. If there is no hyperbole coming from him and his bias is not so much that, but his overwhelming saturation of experience with her. Would this make his assessment of her more or less palatable? It should be noted that he doesn't use the word perception when he is describing her, only assessment. These words have a completely different impact with those in the field of psychology. One word indicates that a person was there to witness events. The other lends itself to someone listening to another describe a given situation. There is surely a sound explanation for this. We have spoke about this. His input into this conversation was that he knows the difference.
...Continued from This is Her
TFM, who was still XMF, at this time, decided that she would sacrifice anyone to set PPO straight. She decided
to use her work assignment as her cover. The thought that nothing would convince PPO that she wasn't hooking up
didn't cross her mind. She sent a photo of her work assignment to him. In the photo she had sent him were the
names, date, time, and location of where she would translate for two little girls. The two girls were the
primary witnesses in a human trafficking ring case. What motivated PPO to make the call is not information that
is available at this time. PPO picked up his phone and called the lead investigator for the case. This person
was a professional, PPO stated. The first concern was if PPO was legitimate. He told the investigator the
location of where the girls were being kept. This was all it took. They had a short conversation, PPO sent the
investigator the information in an encrypted email; text and all. Then he was told he should stay away from
people in general for the next two days.
How do you evaluate the actions of TFM? There is a list of reasons why you shouldn't divulge information of this nature to anyone. What TFM did is morally repugnant. Did she give this vital information to the wrong person? No. If anything she told the right person. There are far more reasons why he should have made the call than not. One thing is abundantly clear. Never trust TFM, to do the right thing.
There isn't a lot of information available from RID (Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf). RID was pushing confidentiality for TFM. RID certainly didn't want any talk of this becoming public. This would not look good. The outcome of TFM's hearing was fairly mundane punishment for what she had done. RID also discovered that TFM is an intravenous drug addict. Even with that added on she got a slap on the wrist. A three-month suspension, fifteen hours of mentoring, a self-reflection and assessment report, and an affidavit stating she would follow the rules. This would have been wrapped up in ninety days. RID did not want it spoke of again, I tried.
Some checks and balances are in order. This doesn't add up. Why did TFM choose to walk away from her career? She has a serious education with a lot of work put into her ASL abilities. The online certification training site was doing well from what could be seen. All she had to do was send out an email letting her regular clients and agencies know that she was taking a three-month sabbatical. Ignore any "rumors" when she came back. Within six or seven months, it's in the past. TFM could not see this as a path back to her success. In her mind PPO had ruined her career. She was not going to accept anything else. There are several other things she could not accept. The entire time she has known PPO, she has made efforts to have him thrown in prison for crimes he did not commit and to murder him. This does not matter. There is no evidence that he retaliated by physically harming her.
Coming soon, the story of XMF and SJE Coming soon, the story of XMF and SJE Coming soon, the story of XMF and SJE Coming soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, Coming soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, Coming soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, the story of XMF and SJEComing soon, the story of XMF and SJEthe story of XMF and SJEthe story of XMF and SJE
How did I become the author of this website? I purchased some sunglasses from a guy on Facebook Market Place. I asked hin if he had anything else to sell. He gave me the run-down on the phones and digital storage devices he had available. Before he would sell me anything he told me that the phone comes with a rather serious warning. By the time he was done, I wasn't buying most of what he was selling. Hyperbole is what I assumed. Upset because his ex, if you could call her that, got over on him.
Then he made me a bet. He gave me a list of things to expect and a list of things that shouldn't be happening on a modern cell phone. I also agreed to take two of the external hard drives with me and a couple of USB drives. Here's the wager. He wouldn't wipe the phone, and I had to look through the hard drives. Two weeks was the time limit we agreed on. If I came back within the two weeks and was not convinced the phone was completely accessible to someone else, that if looking through the material on the drives did not cause me to consider that what he had told me was not true, he would give me back the money, and I could keep the phone and drives.
To win this bet, I had to make an appearance in two weeks and get my money. I was back in five days. I had questions related to the information on the drives. The phone produced almost every behavior he stated that it would. Yes, this could have been him doing this. Considering the wager, what would be the point. He was convinced I would be back.
I wanted to know the correlations between the drive contents and the events he said happened. The problem was that, in some instances, he wouldn't stand a chance in court. Which is obvious by the jail time over the past eight years. What he does have is enough circumstantial evidence to cause you to think. The more I saw, the more I understood that I couldn't say it was not true.
How much of what he said was bias-based? After all this time, his focus has been on his situation. This would cause anyone's thoughts to be skewed. I asked questions and he answered some of them. Others were not answered. The reasons I thought would be shame and embarrassment; these were evident. It wasn't long before I discovered there is a lot of damage. He has shown me physical scars; not all of them. Those scars will never be seen. Even though I haven't seen the scars, this doesn't mean there are none. The problem is believing how he got them. The more I went through the information on the drives, correlations began to take shape. Patterns of behavior started to appear. When you combined these little things, with the handful of big things that are easily fact-checked, it becomes evident that all of these events may have occurred. While my personal experience is limited, I do not see how someone could fabricate all of this?